A/B Testing at Vungle: Leveraging Data Science for Improved Results

Introduction:

In the dynamic landscape of mobile advertising, businesses face the challenge of efficiently targeting potential customers and maximizing revenue. Vungle, an innovative in-app video advertising company, embarked on an A/B testing project to evaluate the performance of a new data science algorithm developed by Andrew Kritzer and Hammond Guerin. While the experiment faced limitations, it provided valuable insights into the algorithm's potential to surpass Vungle's existing solution. This project showcases the application of A/B testing and data analysis skills, highlighting the importance of data-driven decision-making in optimizing business outcomes.

Problem and Objectives:

Vungle sought to enhance the effectiveness of its in-app video advertising by comparing the performance of their existing algorithm with the newly developed algorithm. The primary objective was to determine whether the new algorithm would generate higher revenue, measured by the effective revenue per 1000 impressions (eRPM). By conducting an A/B test, Vungle aimed to gather data, analyze the results, and make informed decisions regarding the adoption of the new algorithm.

Recommended Solution and Value:

The experiment involved dividing the user base into two conditions: condition A, representing users exposed to Vungle's existing algorithm, and condition B, representing users exposed to the new algorithm. Over a one-month period, data on impressions, clicks, completes, and eRPM were collected. To ensure the validity of the analysis, the following assumptions were made:

  1. Independence of Observations: Observations in one sample are assumed to be independent of observations in the other sample. This assumption allows for unbiased comparisons between the algorithms.

  2. Random Sampling: The samples used in the experiment were selected through a random sampling method. Random sampling helps minimize selection biases and ensures that the results are representative of the user base.

  3. Normal Distribution: It is assumed that the variables being measured, such as impressions rate, clicks rate, completes rate, and eRPM, follow a normal distribution. This assumption allows for the use of parametric statistical tests, such as t-tests, to compare the means of the two samples.

  4. Sample Size Adequacy: The sample size used in the analysis is assumed to be large enough to conduct t-tests reliably. A larger sample size generally provides more accurate estimates and increases the power of the statistical tests, allowing for more confident conclusions.

The analysis included comparing the performance of the two algorithms based on the four key metrics: impressions rate, clicks rate, completes rate, and eRPM. The hypotheses were explicitly stated as follows:

  • Null Hypothesis: There exists no difference between Algorithm A and Algorithm B.

  • Alternative Hypothesis: There exists a significant difference between Algorithm A and Algorithm B.

To determine the superiority of the algorithms, t-tests were conducted on all four metrics. The results of the t-tests were used to make informed decisions regarding algorithm performance.

Conclusion: Despite the limitations inherent in this project, such as assumptions about sample independence, random sampling, normal distribution, and sample size, the A/B testing and data analysis provided valuable insights into the performance of the new data science algorithm developed by Andrew Kritzer and Hammond Guerin. By explicitly stating the hypotheses and conducting t-tests on the four key metrics, the analysis allowed for a comprehensive comparison of the algorithms. These insights enable data-driven decision-making and can guide Vungle in making informed choices regarding algorithm adoption.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Data-driven decision-making is crucial for optimizing business outcomes. By conducting A/B testing and analyzing key metrics, businesses can make informed choices that lead to improved performance and revenue generation.

  2. Validating assumptions, such as sample independence, random sampling, normal distribution, and sample size adequacy, is essential to ensure the reliability of results and draw accurate conclusions.

  3. Hypothesis testing, specifically through techniques like t-tests, allows businesses to assess the significance of differences between algorithm performances and make confident decisions based on solid statistical evidence.

  4. A/B testing is a powerful tool for comparing and evaluating different strategies or algorithms, enabling businesses to optimize their approaches and drive success.

Previous
Previous

Building Profit and Loss (P&L) and Balance Sheet (B/S) Statements: SQL Expertise

Next
Next

Gradient Boosting Regression Model: Predicting House Prices with Accuracy and Precision